AutoDrive Papers

V2X collaborative object detection features overcoming the limitations of single-vehicle systems by aggregating environmental features from multiple collaborative agents. However, existing mainstream V2X perception methods mainly focus on 2D BEV object detection. When 3D detection task is concerned, inferior results are obtained because they ignore the 3D spatial misalignment caused by differing height and attitude among the collaborators. In this paper, we propose a novel collaborative 3D object detection framework called CoGoal3D, which extracts and refines the 3D feature gradually in a two-stage pipeline. In the first stage, a multiscale 3D-aware global fusion module is designed to mitigate the 3D spatial misalignment. The resulting proposals are then refined in the second stage with an auxiliary task of 3D point reconstruction. An effective multi-agent collaborative data augmentation strategy is further proposed to enrich the training data while minimizing information loss. Extensive experiments on public real-world datasets demonstrate that our CoGoal3D achieves new state-of-the-art performance, with 3D [email protected] improvements of 10.86%, 10.34%, and 10.18% on the DAIR-V2X, V2V4Real, and V2X-Real datasets, respectively. Code is available at https://github.com/Megalo-f/CoGoal3D.

Generating closed-loop traffic scenarios that are both realistic and controllable is crucial for evaluating autonomous driving systems, especially under rare safety-critical interactions. Existing learning-based methods often struggle to balance controllability and realism, offering either limited fine-grained control over traffic behavior or controllable scenarios at the expense of behavioral plausibility. This paper presents E2E-CDiff, an end-to-end conditional diffusion framework for controllable and realistic scenario generation. Conditioned on front-view visual observations, E2E-CDiff jointly denoises future motion states and executable low-level controls for route-interacting background vehicles. This unified state-action generation mitigates the planning-control mismatch in conventional two-stage trajectory-then-controller pipelines. Differentiable guidance further regulates speed, enforces drivable-area compliance, and supports collision-avoidance or collision-seeking behaviors, enabling both naturalistic and safety-critical scenario generation. Experiments on Bench2Drive show that E2E-CDiff achieves a favorable controllability-realism trade-off compared with representative reinforcement- and imitation-learning baselines, while its collision-guided variant induces challenging interactions across multiple autonomous driving systems. E2E-CDiff also performs competitively as a learning-based ego planner, demonstrating the generality of end-to-end state-action diffusion.

High-level planning for autonomous driving is a knowledge-intensive engineering decision task that requires accurate scene understanding, timely inference, and internally consistent action selection. Vision-language models (VLMs) can make intermediate reasoning explicit, but their use in deployed planners is constrained by costly structured supervision, unnecessary reasoning in routine scenes, and possible inconsistencies between generated rationales and driving actions. We present a cognitive dual-process planning framework that represents planning-relevant scene knowledge in a machine-parsable structured chain-of-thought (S-CoT) schema. An automated data engine integrates perception foundation models, critical-path filtering, and an expert VLM to generate S-CoT supervision without manual annotation of individual rationales. A lightweight visual Arbiter estimates scene complexity from multilevel vision-encoder features before language decoding and routes each input to either fast meta-action prediction or slow structured reasoning. For slow-path outputs, a deterministic rule-based validator checks whether the parsed S-CoT fields are consistent with the final meta-action and provides verifiable rewards for Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). In a 195-scene manual audit, the generated annotations achieve 91.8\% CoT accuracy and a 98.5\% Logical Consistency Score (LCS). On 574 manually verified NAVSIM test samples, the planner achieves 80.14\% planning accuracy and 97.20\% LCS while reducing average latency by 17.39\% relative to applying slow reasoning to every scene. Evaluation on external long-tail subsets further identifies conditions under which routing and planning performance degrade. Together, these results show how explicit scene knowledge can be operationalized through adaptive reasoning and rule-based verification to support high-level VLM planning decisions.

This paper addresses multi-objective kinodynamic planning in environments with stochastic hybrid adversaries that probabilistically transition to adversarial modes based on the ego state. The goal is to construct the Pareto-front of paths that trade off execution cost and the probability of safety constraint violation (risk). Existing chance-constrained planners evaluate risk over open-loop trajectories, yielding overly conservative solutions that fail to account for ego-agent reactivity. To address this limitation, we shift the planning space to sequences of closed-loop policies, and integrate sample-based risk evaluation directly into tree construction via Monte-Carlo particle rollouts. We first introduce Stochastic Multi-Objective RRT (SMO-RRT), for which we prove probabilistic completeness, followed by Stochastic Multi-Objective Stable Sparse RRT (SMO-SST), which leverages selective pruning to improve numerical performance at the cost of completeness. For both algorithms, we derive a finite-sample bound on the probability of chance constraint violation for systems with non-Gaussian, state-dependent uncertainty, enabling probabilistically safe planning in a broad class of environments applicable to multi-agent systems, social navigation, and autonomous driving.

Autonomous racing exposes the sim-to-real gap under extreme operating conditions characterized by high speed, tight stability margins, and stringent real-time constraints. Although simulation is indispensable for development, controllers that perform well in simulation often degrade abruptly on physical platforms due to interacting effects of dynamics mismatch, estimation delay, and execution-layer latency. This paper frames sim-to-real transfer in autonomous racing as a full-stack, real-time systems problem. We introduce a structured three-layer perspective (Physical/Cyber/Execution) to analyze how mismatches propagate and amplify through closed-loop feedback. We present diagnostic metrics beyond nominal lap time, including performance flip, stability-oriented measures, sensitivity to delay and noise, and latency distribution characterization. Mitigation strategies are synthesized from a deployment-oriented viewpoint, emphasizing execution-aware and delay-aware design. Finally, we outline benchmarking guidelines that enable reproducible and fair sim-to-real evaluation under compute and timing constraints. The resulting framework clarifies cross-layer failure mechanisms and provides practical design principles for deployable autonomous racing systems operating near dynamic limits.

Defensive driving is widely recognized as an advanced driving skill. However, whether and how defensive driving affects driving safety remains insufficiently investigated. This study examines the behavioral characteristics of defensive driving, its impact on driving safety, and the underlying mechanisms. First, defensive driving is defined regarding operational timing and application scenario. Then, 82 participants are recruited for driving simulator experiments, with their behavioral and eye movement data being collected. Following the experiments, participants are categorized into groups based on the frequency of defensive driving behaviors exhibited. Finally, both inter-group and inter trial comparisons are performed on the experimental data. Experimental results demonstrate that in the inter-group comparison, the high defensive driving capability group exhibits higher acceleration and deceleration magnitudes, lower average speeds, and larger average absolute yaw angles compared to the low capability group, alongside shorter fixation durations and reduced fixation frequencies. Moreover, we observe that these participants tend to initiate defensive or evasive actions earlier, resulting in lower scenario risk. Regarding the inter-trial comparison, we observe similar trends exclusively in the low capability group, whereas most metrics show no significant differences between Trial 1 and Trial 2 in the high capability group. These results reveal that drivers possessing defensive driving capabilities tend to execute more intense driving maneuvers and identify risks and take action earlier, thereby enhancing driving safety. Findings support the promotion of defensive driving and provide a basis for relevant training programs. Meanwhile, they offer insights for the training of autonomous driving algorithms with defensive driving capabilities.