AutoDrive Papers

LiDAR scene flow estimation has settled into a monoculture: nearly all recent methods share the same feed-forward architecture and the same family of self-supervised losses, inheriting each other's assumptions, and each other's blind spots. When those assumptions fail, as they do for sparse, distant, or fast-moving objects, every method built on them fails together, and adding parameters or simulated training data does not fix what the formulation itself gets wrong. This paper takes the opposite path. We present CorrelationFlow, a training-free geometric framework that reduces scene flow to two textbook operations: connected-component labeling and correlation maximization on bird's-eye-view occupancy images. Objects are isolated as spatio-temporal connected components, their motions recovered as correlation peaks, and the resulting velocities propagated to all member points. However, this dense correlation evaluates every candidate displacement of every cluster and requires a window of past sweeps; therefore, we develop a sparse counterpart that operates on a single sweep pair by matching lightweight occupancy descriptors at boundary key points. Because nothing is trained, nothing is inherited: on the multi-domain test set of the Argoverse 2 2026 Scene Flow Challenge, spanning five datasets with heterogeneous sensors and platforms, CorrelationFlow ranked second among unsupervised methods and degrades most gracefully at long range, where the shared assumptions of learned methods break down. Our results suggest that a substantial share of the scene flow problem is solvable by classical computer vision, and that progress may require questioning the formulation, not scaling it.

Existing autonomous-driving world models typically perform dense prediction of future videos, occupancy states, BEV representations, or agent motion. We argue that planning need not reconstruct the complete future world, but only focus on scene features that affect future ego action. Based on this perspective, we propose Auto-JEPA, an action-oriented latent world model that learns continuous future driving intent through joint-embedding prediction. Given visual observations, egomotion history, and navigation commands, Auto-JEPA predicts an intent embedding aligned with the latent representation of the future ego trajectory. The predicted intent retrieves executable trajectories from a fixed trajectory memory, which are then ranked by a scene-conditioned candidate selection module. Auto-JEPA keeps the visual encoder frozen, requires no explicit perception annotations, and uses no learned trajectory generator. By optimizing only task-specific modules for trajectory representation, intent prediction, and candidate selection, Auto-JEPA achieves 91.3 PDMS on NAVSIM v1 and 89.1 EPDMS on NAVSIM v2. Semantic occlusion experiments show that masking dynamic-agent regions induces an average intent change 2.97x that of equal-area random masking. Moreover, occluding vehicles that affect future driving substantially changes the predicted intent and selected trajectory, whereas both remain essentially unchanged when non-influential vehicles are occluded. These results show that future-intent prediction encourages the model to focus on planning-relevant visual features and supports high-quality planning without dense future-world modeling.

End-to-end (E2E) autonomous driving aims to learn a direct mapping from visual observations to control actions. However, these E2E models often act as black boxes and struggle with complex scenarios. To address this, recent works incorporate Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to provide explicit reasoning, enhancing both interpretability and driving robustness. These approaches typically rely on pre-generated annotations, which suffer from potentially flawed labels and require costly human labor. In this work, we propose a new framework that integrates structured reasoning and geometric precision through a teacher-student architecture. The teacher model introduces reflective reasoning, where the VLM generates logical explanations and then reflectively refines the reasoning under the supervision of ground-truth action. This enhances zero-shot generalization without intermediate labels. The student model distills the teacher's reasoning capabilities via supervised fine-tuning. We also design a separate waypoint decoder that interprets textual reasoning into continuous trajectories. Our proposed solution integrates two goals: providing explicit reasoning for interpretability and delivering robust and accurate driving performance. It leverages the synergy between these two objectives within a staged inference engine to enhance driving performance and explicitly uses the reasoning to guide driving prediction. Evaluated on Waymo benchmarks, our framework outperforms classical reasoning-based baselines in zero-shot reasoning, waypoint accuracy, and inference efficiency. Our experiments validate this design, demonstrating that the reasoning text makes a significant contribution to driving inference, resulting in around a 24% improvement in performance compared to an identical model that lacks reasoning. Our work advances reasoning-driven autonomous driving toward interpretable and deployable systems.

Driving style refers to the behavioral preferences that drivers maintain during driving, shaped by their diverse experiences, habits, and needs, and is typically reflected in varying levels of aggressiveness. If humans choose to use autonomous driving systems, they would expect the driving style of the systems to closely resemble their own habit. However, this is challenging for current industrial autonomous driving systems. To address this, we developed a style controllable action generation method, STAGE, for driving tasks. Its training process is based on imitation learning, incorporating both style value and latent value action modality encoding. Preference learning is then used to identify the user's driving style as a continuous, monotonic style value. And to reduce the cost of human involvement in the preference training process, we also developed a set of rules to compare driving style in data pairs. Then, during inference, the user inputs the style value to control the generated action patterns, dynamically meeting the user's expectations. Using the STAGE method, we verified that the style-controlled action generation results in several typical road scenarios significantly align with human expectations. Furthermore, through comparisons between the STAGE method and various other approaches, we reveal the unique functionalities of STAGE, including its style controllability, style continuity, driving style alignment capability and driving safety. The code for this work is available at: https://github.com/CarlDegio/STAGE